Other Aerial Views

1″ Camera Shootout! DJI Mavic 2 Pro vs Phantom 4 (4K)

0
Please log in or register to do it.
1" Camera Shootout! DJI Mavic 2 Pro vs Phantom 4 (4K)



Mavic 2 Pro ➜ or DJI store ➜ Phantom 4 Adv ➜ or DJI store ➜ …

source

CIUDAD DE BOLOGNA ITALIA
Craco the the silence of the stones

  1. Hi Ben, I am a serious amateur photographer and only interested in images. Once both mavics were launched I thought that my option was "no brainer" with mavic 2 Pro but after seeing a lot of video comparisons and the fact that M2Z has the option of high resolution images now I am very confusing what would be the right option for me. I will appreciate your comments and thanks before hand.

  2. Why create such detailed comparison video without basic investigation that mavic2pro does crap pixel binning from whole sensor which means it simply does not use 1inch properly

  3. I'm interested in buying my first drone. Up till now I always thought it would be a P4, but now I'm not so sure. The MP2 just flies too good, I figure shaky footage would just be too hard to work with. Just subscribed.

  4. It's funny that the moment the p4p came out there were no complaints, now all of a sudden it wiggles too much in the air when there's wind. Ridiculous. So the p4p is too saturated compared to the mavic but the Sony image with all that contrast looks better than the mavic in your opinion. Unless your blind that mavic looks inferior. To each their own. But I highly disagree with this justification. I own a mavic

  5. P4P Obsidian for me. Color seems more real,more sharpness, mechanical schutter over all better camera for some and depending of your needs, Dji is doing this on a business goal they going to do a lens exchange on the Phantom 5.

  6. Hey authen tech, how about racing both drones against each other since they both are the best consumer drones, phantom 4pro v2.0 against the mavic 2pro, would love to see that happen

  7. that's it – nice to have, as you said (60 fps at 4k) but not more than that. Slowing down drone footage that already can be so slow and smooth and when yes then do you really need it in for 4k? So much slowed footage around that people are gradually getting sick of it. So for me that's not an issue at all

  8. I would give Mavic "A-" and P4 an "A". For "Video" 60FPS in 4k P4 wins all the way. Drones are mostly used for video and not still shots. Again for pro video, P4 does a better video, IMHO

  9. Yeh, I'm also surprised that the 4K HQ option looks a lot better! I'm so glad it's there though because the P4P doesn't have that and it's the same sensor. So that's a great add on. Like an APS-C mode on full frame cameras.

    I was also surprised that it looks better because Sony is so good at oversampling their 6K footage to get 4K footage and it looks incredible. The thing is, I think this is very hard to do well without pixel binning. Which is also the exact reason that the Canon EOS R crops in 4K. Canon said the full frame 4K just didn't look good enough, so I think they weren't able to do the oversampling as well as Sony. It's clearly pretty difficult.

  10. this was the drone I wanted 6 months ago for a job but there was nothing but the phantom 4 pro for the 1 inch. I love the portability and rock solid stability of the Mavic 2. the P4P is for when I need 4K60fps.

  11. Thanks for saying which one you like more instead of hiding behind the opinions of your comment section. I'd love to see the differences (if any) in shooting in low-light, like say night time city shots, between the Mavic 2 and the Phantom "Pro". Just want to add I think the Mavic 2 is also slightly better when one considers portability and price. I wish it had 4k/60 with a 1:1 FOV equal to that of the phantom but I'll sacrifice that no problem for the portability and overall awesomeness of the Mavic 2.